🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various politicians to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.